A barrister has develop into embroiled in a racism row after he known as a schoolgirl who received a discrimination settlement a ‘stroppy teenager of color’.

Join Our Facebook Group Here

Jon Holbrook commented on the case of Ruby Williams, now 18, who was awarded £8,500 following an Equality Act case towards her faculty in east London.

She was 14 when she was informed by Urswick College in Hackney that her Afro coiffure was towards their uniform coverage and despatched residence from her courses.   

Mr Holbrook, who was known as to the Bar 30 years in the past, retweeted a put up by the Equality and Human Rights Fee which referred to the case on January 17.

He mentioned: ‘The Equality Act undermines faculty self-discipline by empowering the stroppy teenager of color.’

His tweet, shared to 7,400 followers, has since been criticised by a swathe of legal professionals on social media.   

Jon Holbrook commented on the case of Ruby Williams (seen with her parents Kate and Lenny), now 18, who was awarded £8,500 following an Equality Act case against her school in east London

Jon Holbrook commented on the case of Ruby Williams (seen together with her dad and mom Kate and Lenny), now 18, who was awarded £8,500 following an Equality Act case towards her faculty in east London 

Mr Holbrook, who was called to the Bar 30 years ago, retweeted a post by the Equality and Human Rights Commission which referred to the case on January 17.  He said: 'The Equality Act undermines school discipline by empowering the stroppy teenager of colour'

Mr Holbrook, who was known as to the Bar 30 years in the past, retweeted a put up by the Equality and Human Rights Fee which referred to the case on January 17.  He mentioned: ‘The Equality Act undermines faculty self-discipline by empowering the stroppy teenager of color’

Mr Holbrook’s chambers, Cornerstone Barristers in Grey’s Inn Sq., mentioned they ‘repudiate’ the tweet and ‘all that it insinuates,’ including: ‘The contents of this tweet are opposite to the views of Cornerstone Barristers.’

Philip Coppel QC and Tom Cosgrove QC, joint Cornerstone heads, mentioned that they had requested Mr Holbrook to delete the tweet twice, however he ‘is refusing to take action.’

They added: ‘The Board of Cornerstone Barristers is coping with the matter. To be clear: this matter is being taken very severely.

‘The contents of this tweet are opposite to the views of Cornerstone Barristers.

Mr Holbrook (pictured) has been criticised by a swathe of lawyers following his comment

Mr Holbrook (pictured) has been criticised by a swathe of legal professionals following his remark

‘We unequivocally condemn discrimination in all of its varieties and are pleased with our document as a various chambers which promotes social mobility on the Bar.’  

Mr Holbrook’s remark was additionally criticised by others within the authorized occupation. 

Labour MP David Lammy, who’s educated as a barrister, mentioned: ‘What a pathetic response from a barrister.

‘Nobody must be discriminated towards due to their race, or as a result of their hair is completely different. You disgrace the Bar and undermine your occupation.’   

Barrister Becky Agates added: ‘I’ve sat right here staring on the display… unable to put in writing.

‘You are a member of my occupation, a occupation I like and respect, but you are feeling protected and comfy tweeting one thing like this.

‘What’s mistaken with you, other than the plain? Do the fitting factor, take it down.’ 

David Turner QC mentioned: ‘That is essentially the most shameful tweet that I’ve ever seen from a barrister.

Labour MP David Lammy, who is trained as a barrister, said: 'What a pathetic response from a barrister. No one should be discriminated against because of their race, or because their hair is different. You shame the Bar and undermine your profession'

Labour MP David Lammy, who’s educated as a barrister, mentioned: ‘What a pathetic response from a barrister. Nobody must be discriminated towards due to their race, or as a result of their hair is completely different. You disgrace the Bar and undermine your occupation’

‘I’m so sorry [Ruby’s mother] Kate Williams – you and Ruby don’t deserve this.’ 

Ms Williams, 44, mentioned she had tried to contact Mr Holbrook following his remark.

She informed the lawyer: ‘I’m her mum and despatched you a message some time in the past. You did not reply. Everybody else has mentioned all of it already however I needed to say thanks.

‘By attempting to say she was within the mistaken… you’ve got really highlighted this terrible type of discrimination once more. The world is altering.’

The mom added: ‘It is a nice shock that this has blown up, as a result of the problem remains to be there. We’re very conscious of what number of different youngsters are nonetheless going through this at UK faculties.

‘It permits to problem and put strain on UK faculties as to when they’ll type this out.’   

Following the backlash, Mr Holbrook shared an article during which he mentioned he defined how ‘as an alternative of difficult racism, equality legislation promotes racial privilege.’

Mr Holbrook's chambers, Cornerstone Barristers in Gray’s Inn Square, said they 'repudiate' the tweet and 'all that it insinuates,' adding: 'The contents of this tweet are contrary to the views of Cornerstone Barristers'. Pictured: Ms Williams

Mr Holbrook’s chambers, Cornerstone Barristers in Grey’s Inn Sq., mentioned they ‘repudiate’ the tweet and ‘all that it insinuates,’ including: ‘The contents of this tweet are opposite to the views of Cornerstone Barristers’. Pictured: Ms Williams

Following the backlash, Mr Holbrook shared an article in which he said he explained how 'instead of challenging racism, equality law promotes racial privilege'

Following the backlash, Mr Holbrook shared an article during which he mentioned he defined how ‘as an alternative of difficult racism, equality legislation promotes racial privilege’

The article, penned for The Conservative Girl, mentioned: ‘Authorized arguments over Afro hair, dreadlocks and cornrows have been used to undermine faculty uniform insurance policies and, extra severely, the target behind them, that of overcoming racial distinction and division.’

He added: ‘When the kid is saying “I’ve a distinct race and tradition to which the college should adapt” he’s requiring the college to adapt to him. He’s looking for a dispensation and privilege. 

‘However he should be adapting to the college, which is imposing a socially fascinating norm.

‘It’s time for a severe debate concerning the hurt that equality legislation is inflicting to society.’

Pictured: Ruby Williams, who was awarded £8,500 following an Equality Act case against her school

Pictured: Ruby Williams, who was awarded £8,500 following an Equality Act case towards her faculty

The row started after Mr Holbrook shared a video concerning the case of Ms Williams, who was repeatedly despatched residence from faculty as a result of lecturers mentioned her Afro hair blocked different pupils from seeing the whiteboard.

{The teenager}, then 14, was informed her coiffure was towards uniform coverage, with the Church of England faculty additionally telling her it was making an attempt to fulfill well being and security requirements.

Ms Williams, obtained a £8,500 payout final February after her household took authorized motion with the backing of the Equality and Human Rights Fee.

They claimed that she had been discriminated towards on the premise of race. 

She mentioned that she had been ‘humiliated’ by the college’s actions and her dad and mom, Kate and Lenny, mentioned the three-year battle ‘destroyed’ their daughter’s confidence.

She was informed her hair breached coverage, which acknowledged that ‘afro model hair should be of cheap measurement and size’. This coverage has since been faraway from the web site. 

Mr Holbrook informed the Times: ‘Liberal democracies are premised on free speech and we curtail it at our peril. I’ve for a few years criticised legal guidelines that allow particular person rights to trump collective pursuits. Many provisions of the Equality Act do that, which is why I criticise them in my political capability.’ 

He added that his ‘political opinions are by no means expressed as a member of Cornerstone Barristers, as a result of they don’t have anything to do with my work as a member.

‘My day job is anxious with how the legislation is, my political curiosity is anxious with the way it must be. A lot of my critics appear unable to know this distinction. Others are merely motivated by a loathing for conservative and populist opinions.’ 

MailOnline has contacted Mr Holbrook for additional remark. 



Source link

Please follow and like us:

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here