Juror 2 is a white man in his twenties. He was the primary juror seated and in addition the one one who throughout jury choice stated he hadn’t ever seen bystander video of Floyd’s demise.
Juror 2 is a chemist who has a mixed diploma in environmental research and chemistry and works in a lab the place he checks samples for contaminants that could be dangerous to the surroundings or employee hygiene.
He stated he enjoys outside actions, together with Final Frisbee, backpacking and biking. He and his fiancée visited George Floyd Sq. as a result of Floyd’s arrest was such a ‘transformative occasion for that space’.
Juror 9 is a bi-racial lady in her twenties who has Kind 1 diabetes and grew up in a small city in northern Minnesota the place her uncle serves as a police officer.
Throughout jury choice she admitted to being ‘tremendous excited’ on the prospect of sitting on the jury described herself as a ‘go-with-the-flow, open-minded kind of particular person’.
She stated she solely watched the bystander video as soon as, and it gave her a ‘considerably damaging’ impression of Chauvin. She stated ‘that video simply makes you unhappy. No person needs to see any person die, whether or not it was his fault or not’. She stated there could possibly be different attainable explanations for Chauvin’s actions, suggesting that Floyd may need been resisting, or civilian lives might have been at risk.
The graphic above reveals the make-up of the jury that discovered Derek Chauvin responsible of homicide and manslaughter within the demise of George Floyd after a grueling three-week trial. Drawn from a pool of 300 potential jurors their identities have been a intently guarded secret after Choose Cahill handed down an Order of Anonymity permitting only some key particulars about every particular person to be launched publicly
Juror 19 is a white man in his 30s who stated he had a ‘considerably damaging view’ of Chauvin and helps Black Lives Matter on the whole however disagrees with among the methods group members go about issues throughout his voire dire. He has an unfavorable opinion of Blue Lives Matter.
Juror 19 stated he has a ‘pal of a pal’ who works for Minneapolis police however that he had not mentioned the case with him. He wrote in his questionnaire that he heard Floyd was on exhausting medication, however stated he would not imagine it ought to have a lot influence on the case. ‘Whether or not you’re below the affect of medicine would not decide whether or not you need to be residing or useless,’ he stated.
As an auditor, Juror 19 stated he tries to resolve battle and make selections primarily based on information, not feelings.
Juror 27 is a black man in his 30s who immigrated to America 14 years in the past and went to high school in Nebraska earlier than transferring to Minnesota in 2012. He works as a supervisor of eight individuals in IT safety, speaks a number of languages together with French, has a spouse and a canine, and is a fan of the Minnesota Gophers and Vikings.
Juror 27 had seen video of Floyd’s demise and recalled telling his spouse on the time: ‘That might have been me, or anybody else.’ He stated he had a considerably damaging view of Chauvin primarily based on the video and that he hoped to be taught at trial extra about occasions that led as much as Floyd’s arrest.
Juror 44 is a white lady in her 50s and single mom of two teenage sons who’s an government in a non-profit health-care advocacy group. She stated that she had mentioned white privilege with a black co-worker to whom she is shut. She additionally stated she had prior skilled dealings with Minnesota Legal professional Common Keith Ellison in her job, however stated it will not have an effect on her impartiality.
Juror 44 stated she was uncovered to lots of information about this case, including that the media is biased and would not have all of the information. She noticed solely a part of the bystander video and stated she has empathy for each Floyd and Chauvin. She stated she had a considerably damaging view of Chauvin and a impartial opinion of Floyd, saying he was not a mannequin citizen however did not ‘should die’.
She stated she strongly agrees that the prison justice system is biased towards racial and ethnic minorities. ‘Not all police are dangerous,’ she stated. ‘I do not need them terrorized or disrespected. However dangerous police have to go.’
Jurors got the above ‘Known as to Serve’ doc that gave tips about how to deal with what could possibly be a nerve-racking expertise. ‘We recognize you,’ it stated
Juror 52 – Brandon Mitchell: Mitchell revealed himself in an interview Wednesday.
He had initially be recognized as a black man in his 30s who works in banking, coaches youth sports activities and writes creatively for a interest, together with scripts and poetry.
He stated he had impartial opinions on Chauvin and Floyd. He stated he had not seen the bystander video in its entirety however had seen clips of it two or 3 times. He stated he had not posted about it on social media however had talked with household and buddies and he wrote in his questionnaire that his opinion has been ‘why did not the opposite officers cease Chauvin.’
‘I do not know if he was doing one thing incorrect or not, however any person died … Even in case you have no intention of doing one thing and one thing occurs, any person may’ve nonetheless intervened and prevented that,’ he stated. He has a really favorable view of Black Lives Matter, saying: ‘Black lives simply wish to be handled as equals and never killed or handled in an aggressive method just because they’re black.’
Juror 55 is a white lady in her 50s, a single mom of two who works as an government assistant at a healthcare clinic, sells Pampered Chef and rides a motorcycle in reminiscence of her late husband with whom she as soon as shared the pastime.
She stated she was disturbed by the bystander video however did not see the total factor as a result of ‘I simply could not watch it anymore. She stated she had been scared by the unrest that overwhelmed Minneapolis final Might and in addition admitted to having shaped a ‘considerably damaging view of Chauvin’ as a result of she feels he may’ve dealt with the state of affairs otherwise.
Nonetheless, she stated she would not be capable to type an opinion till she has the entire information. She has a fundamental belief in law enforcement officials, and a considerably unfavorable view of Black Lives Matter, saying: ‘All lives matter to me. It would not matter who they’re or what they’re.’
Juror 79 is a black man in his 40s and a father who works in administration and immigrated to the Twin Cities from West Africa 20 years in the past. He claimed to be fully impartial when it got here to Chauvin and stated that he had, ‘no opinion’ as to the reason for Floyd’s demise.
Juror 79 stated he lives in a suburb and his residence was burglarized as soon as and police responded appropriately, though the suspect was by no means caught. He stated he trusts police, but in addition feels it is applicable for jurors to guage an officer’s actions. ‘I might say it is one other pair of eyes and a brand new thoughts simply trying on the motion,’ he stated.
He stated he would inform his son – who was about to take driver’s training – that when police cease him, he ought to cooperate. When requested if individuals who do not cooperate have themselves guilty, he stated: ‘Cooperation is nice. … You assist everyone.’
Juror 85 is a biracial lady in her 40s who’s married with a small baby, grew up in a river city and attended faculty in Wisconsin, and works as a advisor to corporations present process reorganizations and different transitions.
She stated she has a impartial view of Floyd, writing in her questionnaire that she knew he died ‘on account of this encounter’ however didn’t know what his actions had been earlier than it occurred. When pressed if she thought Chauvin was accountable, she stated: ‘No, I by no means heard what a explanation for demise was.’
She stated she has a reasonably robust religion in police, however that they’re human and might make errors. She stated she would usually agree that if somebody doesn’t cooperate, she or he may need themselves guilty. ‘You respect police and also you do what they ask,’ she stated.
Juror 89 is white lady in her 50s who lives in a suburb and as a cardiac nurse works with ventilated sufferers, together with these with COVID-19.
Regardless of having shaped no opinion on how Floyd died stated she had seen among the video and admitted that her coaching would affect her views on whether or not Chauvin administered fundamental first support coaching and in her evaluation of when it grew to become mandatory to take action.
She was questioned extensively about her expertise as a nurse, whether or not she has ever resuscitated anybody and the way she would view medical proof within the case. The lady stated she would draw upon her information to guage medical testimony, however stated she would chorus from utilizing her information within the jury room.
She stated she considerably disagrees that it is not proper to second-guess selections officers make.
Juror 91 is a black lady and grandmother in her 60s who has a relative who serves as a Minneapolis Police officer however to whom she stated she was not shut. She studied baby psychology and labored in advertising earlier than she retired, and he or she felt strongly that being on a jury was her civic responsibility.
The lady, who volunteers with underserved youth, stated she watched the bystander video of Floyd’s arrest for about 4 or 5 minutes, then shut it off as a result of ‘it simply wasn’t one thing that I wanted to see’.
She grew up about 10 or 15 blocks from the location of Floyd’s arrest, however stated she moved many years in the past and has no motive to revisit the world. She had a really favorable view of Black Lives Matter, writing in her questionnaire ‘I’m Black and my life issues,’ although she stated she shouldn’t be acquainted with the group.
Juror 92, the ultimate juror seated is a white lady in her 40s who admitted to having heard concerning the metropolis’s $27million civil settlement with the Floyd household however stated it will not bias her and that she may stay impartial. She stated she had watched the video of Floyds demise a minimum of 4 or 5 instances however when requested what media protection she was conscious of she stated solely that Chauvin was ‘an aggressive cop with tax issues.’
She stated she has expertise with somebody who struggled with alcohol, and may view somebody who makes use of medication with warning, out of concern they may act violently or aggressively when below the affect. Nonetheless, she stated, she would not agree that somebody who makes use of medication or would not cooperate with police needs to be handled poorly. ‘If somebody makes use of medication, I do not suppose there needs to be ramifications of violence for that,’ she stated.