A mom of two is suing the Liberal Democrats after she was barred from working for Parliament for saying transgender girls aren’t girls. 

Join Our Facebook Group Here

Natalie Chook, 40, was banned from the social gathering workplace for 10 years after a grievance about her sporting a T-shirt saying ‘Lady: Grownup, Human, Feminine’.

Ms Chook, who escaped an abusive companion, beforehand confronted allegations of transphobia in 2018 when trans woman Zoe O’Connell allegedly complained about her suggesting girls refuges needs to be segregated primarily based on organic intercourse fairly than chosen gender.

A disciplinary listening to discovered no proof of transphobia on the time however she misplaced her place as chairwoman of the Radical Affiliation after a vote of no confidence.

And a second probe has now seen her banned from standing as an MP in Wakefield, Yorkshire, after she wore the T-shirt.

Natalie Bird is suing the Liberal Democrats after she was barred from running for Parliament in Wakefield, Yorkshire, for saying transgender women are not women

Natalie Chook is suing the Liberal Democrats after she was barred from working for Parliament in Wakefield, Yorkshire, for saying transgender girls aren’t girls

Ms Bird, 40, was banned from the party office for 10 years after a complaint about her wearing a T-shirt saying 'Woman: Adult, Human, Female'. Ms Bird previously faced allegations of transphobia in 2018 when trans woman Zoe O'Connell (left) allegedly complained about her suggesting women refuges should be segregated based on biological sex rather than chosen gender

Ms Chook, 40, was banned from the social gathering workplace for 10 years after a grievance about her sporting a T-shirt saying ‘Lady: Grownup, Human, Feminine’. Ms Chook beforehand confronted allegations of transphobia in 2018 when trans girl Zoe O’Connell (left) allegedly complained about her suggesting girls refuges needs to be segregated primarily based on organic intercourse fairly than chosen gender

Her accusers stated she was ‘disseminating transphobic materials over a protracted time’ and she or he was banned from in search of workplace for a decade.

Now she has launched authorized motion towards the social gathering for discrimination underneath the Equality Act 2010, claiming she was ‘hounded’ by trans activists.

Ms Chook instructed The Telegraph: ‘There was a witch hunt towards me as a result of I’ve obtained these viewpoints, it’s fairly sinister.

Mom-of-two legislation pupil, 29, is cleared of misconduct by college after saying ‘girls have vaginas’ throughout seminar on transgender points 

 

A mother-of-two legislation pupil who was investigated by college chiefs after saying ‘girls have vaginas’ has at present been cleared of misconduct.

Mature pupil Lisa Keogh, 29, was hauled earlier than a disciplinary panel on the College of Abertay in Dundee after her feedback made throughout a seminar on transgender points had been reported to tutors by her classmates. 

However after a two month probe, which passed off whereas she underwent her last yr exams, the college’s disciplinary board has determined to not uphold the misconduct cost towards her. 

Right this moment Ms Keogh hit out on the college for subjecting her to what she described as  a ‘merciless modern-day witch hunt’ as a consequence of her ‘gender important views’.

The college deny Ms Keogh was put via the disciplinary process due to her ‘private opinions’.

In a remark, despatched to MailOnline, a ‘victorious’ Ms Keogh stated: ‘As overjoyed as I’m about this choice, I’m saddened that I went via this at such a important time in my college profession. 

‘The very finish of my interval at Abertay is now tarnished with these unhealthy reminiscences.

‘I know the college has an obligation to research all complaints, however to attract this course of out for 2 months whereas I used to be taking my last exams was needlessly merciless.

‘I all the time knew the complaints made towards me had been groundless and now the Scholar Disciplinary Board has confirmed that. 

‘I used to be focused due to my gender important views – it was a modern-day witch hunt.’

The row erupted after Ms Keogh made feedback throughout a dialogue on transgender points in an internet seminar.

She stated through the seminar that ladies had been born with feminine genitals and the distinction in bodily energy between women and men ‘was a reality’.  

Ms Keogh was reported to educational chiefs by classmates who launched a proper probe for alleged ‘offensive’ and ‘discriminatory’ feedback.

‘Inside day after day life I’ve obtained trans mates, and in the event you’ve obtained someone who needs to be handled as a girl socially, I imagine all people ought to do this, be well mannered and provides them their most well-liked identify. 

‘However that doesn’t mechanically imply that you simply develop into a girl.’

The Liberal Democrats stated: ‘The social gathering is presently finishing up a number of inside investigations involving Natalie Chook. 

‘As such, we can’t remark additional till the investigations are full.’ 

She stated the grievance towards her in 2018 was a smear by Ms O’Connel. Ms O’Connell denied all information of the case and that she was the complainant on the time. 

Ms Chook instructed The Times: ‘Their techniques appears to be the identical as these utilized by abusive males: they play the sufferer publicly then privately attempt to do all the pieces they will to regulate how others see you. 

‘They struggle to remove your voice and self-worth after which if that does not work, threaten suicide. They constructed a smear marketing campaign towards me, shutting me out of Fb teams, no-platforming me and silencing my considerations.

‘Standing up for the rights of weak girls is nothing I needs to be ashamed of. The dearth of freedom of speech and freedom of thought on this problem is frankly terrifying.’

Ms Chook has acquired backing from a tax knowledgeable who misplaced her job after claiming folks can’t change their organic intercourse received her enchantment towards an employment tribunal.

Maya Forstater’s contract was not renewed in March 2019 after she posted Tweets opposing authorities proposals to reform the Gender Recognition Act to permit folks to determine as the alternative intercourse.

The Central London Employment Tribunal had initially upheld the dismissal following the posts.

In March, Ms Forstater Tweeted: ‘Natalie Chook was suspended from the Lib Dems for refusing to recite the Trans Girls are Girls Credo. 

‘Assist her take her case to court docket.’

However on Thursday a Excessive Court docket choose stated the unique tribunal had ‘erred in legislation’, however added: ‘This judgment doesn’t imply that these with gender-critical beliefs can ‘misgender’ trans individuals with impunity.’

Discovering in favour of Ms Forstater, Mr Justice Choudhury stated her views ‘might be profoundly offensive and even distressing’, however stated they ‘have to be tolerated in a pluralist society’.

Ms Forstater, 47, who labored as a tax knowledgeable on the Centre for World Improvement (CGD), a world suppose tank that campaigns towards poverty and inequality, took her case to an employment tribunal on the grounds that her dismissal constituted discrimination towards her beliefs. 

Reacting to the landmark judgement, Ms Forstater stated she was ‘extremely proud’ and insisted the ruling will defend girls’s rights within the office.

Amanda Glassman, Chief Govt Officer of CGDE and Govt Vice President of CGD, stated: ‘The choice is disappointing and stunning as a result of we imagine Choose Tayler obtained it proper when he discovered any such offensive speech causes hurt to trans folks, and due to this fact couldn’t be protected underneath the Equality Act.

‘Right this moment’s choice is a step backwards for inclusivity and equality for all. We’re presently contemplating the assorted paths ahead with our legal professionals.’

The employment tribunal had upheld the dismissal after choose James Tayler described her beliefs as ‘undeserving of respect in a democratic society’.

Her case gained nationwide consideration after Harry Potter creator JK Rowling voiced her help, and stated she disagreed with the tribunal’s choice to throw out her discrimination declare.



Source link

Please follow and like us:

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here