Scott Lee Peterson, 48, is seeking to have his 2004 murder conviction overturned

Scott Lee Peterson, 48, is searching for to have his 2004 homicide conviction overturned

Join Our Facebook Group Here

Scott Peterson’s attorneys have new proof, new witnesses and the names of his pregnant spouse’s true killers, they declare as they search to get his homicide conviction tossed out.

Peterson, 48, appeared remotely in San Mateo County Courtroom in California on Tuesday, the place his attorneys sought to overturn his 2004 conviction, claiming a juror did not disclose key data earlier than trial.

In a case that spawned a media frenzy and impressed the Ben Affleck movie Gone Woman, Peterson was sentenced to dying for killing his spouse Laci Peterson and their unborn son Connor, however his dying sentence was overturned final 12 months over questions on jury choice.

Now, his attorneys search to win Peterson a brand new trial, and say they’ve suspects who have been Laci’s actual kidnappers and killers. In addition they declare to have new witnesses who noticed her alive after the time authorities mentioned she was murdered, in accordance with CBS News, which is able to function the case in a brand new episode of 48 Hours.

Peterson, a fertilizer salesman, said that he went fishing in San Francisco Bay when his 27-year-old wife Laci, who was eight months pregnant, vanished from their Modesto home

Peterson, a fertilizer salesman, mentioned that he went fishing in San Francisco Bay when his 27-year-old spouse Laci, who was eight months pregnant, vanished from their Modesto residence

Peterson was convicted of killing his wife and unborn son after their bodies were found in the Bay, and Amber Frey revealed he'd had an affair and told her his wife was dead

Peterson was convicted of killing his spouse and unborn son after their our bodies have been discovered within the Bay, and Amber Frey revealed he’d had an affair and informed her his spouse was lifeless

Peterson’s appeals lawyer Cliff Gardner didn’t instantly reply to an inquiry from DailyMail.com on Friday searching for extra details about the brand new witnesses and suspects. 

Peterson, a fertilizer salesman, mentioned that he was fishing in San Francisco Bay when his 27-year-old spouse Laci, who was eight months pregnant, vanished from their Modesto neighborhood on Christmas Eve 2002.  Her physique was discovered within the bay months later.

Amber Frey got here ahead and revealed that Peterson was having an affair along with her and lied about being married, then claimed his spouse was lifeless.

The case sparked intense hypothesis and debate, with Peterson’s defenders mentioning that the case towards him was completely circumstantial, with no direct forensic proof tying him to the homicide.

After Tuesday’s listening to, Peterson lawyer Pat Harris addressed the press, insisting on his consumer’s innocence.

‘Scott is sitting in a cell and he is harmless. From the second I met him, from the primary three months I sat in a jail cell with him in Modesto each single day, he was all the time telling the very same story,’ Harris informed KRON-TV.

‘It by no means, ever modified, it by no means contradicted. It was wonderful as a result of each consumer I’ve ever had, you’ll be able to virtually all the time decide up contradictions of their tales. By no means did with him. He is all the time been very truthful with me,’ added Harris.

Peterson, 48, appeared remotely in San Mateo County Court in California on Tuesday, where his attorneys sought to overturn his 2004 conviction

Peterson, 48, appeared remotely in San Mateo County Courtroom in California on Tuesday, the place his attorneys sought to overturn his 2004 conviction

Peterson has already won a new sentencing trial, and now seeks to have his conviction tossed

Peterson has already received a brand new sentencing trial, and now seeks to have his conviction tossed

He additionally mentioned nationwide information headlines portray Peterson as a ‘psychopath’ are false.

Harris was on Peterson’s authentic trial group alongside celeb lawyer Mark Geragos. 

Final August, the California Supreme Courtroom mentioned Peterson’s dying sentence couldn’t stand as a result of potential jurors have been improperly dismissed from the jury pool after saying they personally disagreed with the dying penalty, however could be keen to observe the regulation and impose it.

Within the second ruling, the court docket ordered a San Mateo choose to resolve whether or not the conviction itself should be overturned as a result of one juror did not disclose that she sought a restraining order in 2000 whereas she was pregnant.

Juror #7, Richelle Good, did not disclose home violence incidents when requested if she had ever been the sufferer of against the law, and Peterson’s protection group argued that she is a ‘rogue juror’ who already made up her thoughts about his guilt earlier than the trial. 

Harris mentioned Good was biased towards Laci as a result of each girls have been victimized whereas pregnant. Good insisted she did not view her historical past as related.

Juror #7, Richelle Nice, failed to disclose domestic violence incidents while she was pregnant when asked if she had ever been the victim of a crime, leading Peterson's attorneys to call her a 'rogue juror' who already had decided on his guilt

Juror #7, Richelle Good, did not disclose home violence incidents whereas she was pregnant when requested if she had ever been the sufferer of against the law, main Peterson’s attorneys to name her a ‘rogue juror’ who already had selected his guilt

Scott Peterson is seen with defense attorneys Mark Geragos (left) and Pat Harris at his 2004 trial. Harris now argues that Nice was biased toward Laci because both women were victimized while pregnant

Scott Peterson is seen with protection attorneys Mark Geragos (left) and Pat Harris at his 2004 trial. Harris now argues that Good was biased towards Laci as a result of each girls have been victimized whereas pregnant

Scott Peterson trial jurors, including Richelle Nice, arrive at the San Mateo County Superior Courthouse on February 25, 2005 in Redwood City, California

Scott Peterson trial jurors, together with Richelle Good, arrive on the San Mateo County Superior Courthouse on February 25, 2005 in Redwood Metropolis, California

After the trial, Good exchanged dozens of jail letters with Peterson through which she expressed her grief for Laci and Conner.

‘The spot the place your stunning spouse washed ashore…and YOU robbed her & your stunning son of a life with one another,’ Good wrote in a single letter.

‘What pushed you thus far to the restrict, the place you felt that you simply wanted to kill somebody who not solely cherished you a lot, however somebody who was carring [sic] a part of you inside her?’ the letter continued. 

‘My coronary heart aches on your son. Why could not he have the identical probabilities in life as you got. You need to have been dreaming of your son being the very best at no matter he did in life, not planning a strategy to eliminate him!’ wrote Good.

Now, San Mateo Choose Anne Christine Massullo must resolve if that was juror misconduct, and if that’s the case whether or not it was so prejudicial {that a} new trial is warranted. 

Prosecutors have already introduced that they are going to search to re-impose the dying penalty, which would require a brand new sentencing part of the trial.

Scott and Laci Peterson are seen on their wedding day in 1997. Laci was eight months pregnant with their son when she disappeared from their home in Modesto

Scott and Laci Peterson are seen on their wedding ceremony day in 1997. Laci was eight months pregnant with their son when she disappeared from their residence in Modesto

Regardless of throwing out the dying penalty, the Supreme Courtroom mentioned there was appreciable incriminating circumstantial proof towards Peterson, together with that he researched ocean currents, purchased a ship with out telling anybody, and could not clarify what kind of fish he was attempting to catch that day.

He additionally offered his spouse’s automotive, thought-about promoting their home, and turned the infant nursery right into a storage room earlier than their our bodies have been discovered, the court docket mentioned in August, all indicating that ‘he already knew Laci and Conner have been by no means coming again.’

Detective Jon Buehler, one of many authentic investigators on the case, informed 48 Hours that no new proof has emerged to persuade him of Peterson’s innocence. 

‘Effectively I suppose it is doable,’ mentioned Buehler. ‘However you recognize, there’s nonetheless those that imagine the earth is flat, too.’ 

California has not executed anybody since 2006 due to authorized challenges, and Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom issued a moratorium on executions for so long as he’s governor. 

Peterson is at the moment incarcerated at San Quentin, and due again in court docket in June for a listening to on his petition for a brand new trial. 

The 48 Hours episode on the case will air this Saturday at 10pm ET on CBS. 



Source link

Please follow and like us:

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here